Revisiting the Logical Empiricist Criticisms of Vitalism

Bohang Chen

Abstract


Vitalism claims that biological organisms are governed by nonmaterial agents like entelechies. The received view today rejects vitalism by presupposing metaphysical materialism (or physicalism). Metaphysical materialism maintains that the world is ultimately material (or physical), and it, therefore, repudiates the existence of nonmaterial entelechies. However, this marks a shift compared with the arguments against vitalism developed by logical empiricists, who were indifferent to metaphysical issues and were only concerned with logical and empirical matters in the sciences. Logical empiricists rejected the concept of the entelechy (vitalism), because vital laws confirmed by biological phenomena were unavailable; in contrast, they accepted the concept of the atom (materialism), since it constituted physical laws and was therefore associated with verifiable results in modern physics.

Keywords


Vitalism; Logical Empiricism

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24117/2526-2270.2019.i7.03

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science



ISSN: 2526-2270


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

Connect with us

 

 

Indexing and Abstracting

Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science is indexed and abstracted in the following directories and databases: